Events

Past events

  • June 24, 2020: Battling Cybersecurity Threats: Role of Congressional Oversight

    As part of a broader effort examining congressional oversight of science and technology issues, the Levin Center at Wayne State University Law School and the Wayne Law Review jointly hosted a panel on congressional oversight of issues related to cybersecurity.

    The webinar heard from:

    Moderator: Prof. Fred Chang, Department of Computer Science Chair and Director of the Darwin Deason Institute for Cyber Security, Southern Methodist University

    Patrick Warren, Counsel, U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI), who discussed PSI’s cybersecurity oversight efforts, including its 2019 report on cyber vulnerabilities at 8 agencies.

    Prof. Chris Bryant, University of Cincinnati, and Assistant Prof. Kimberly Breedon, Barry University School of Law, who discussed using congressional oversight to address conflicts of interest and cybersecurity issues related to voting systems.

    Prof. M. Tia Johnson, Georgetown University Law Center, who discussed election cyber vulnerabilities, highlighting a 2018 report by the Congressional Task Force on Election Security.

    Prof. Jonathan Lewallen, University of Tampa, who explored Congress’ use of information sharing requirements to evaluate cybersecurity vulnerabilities and performance. 

    Welcoming remarks were provided by Levin Center director Jim Townsend and Wayne Law Review editor William Broman. 

    See or download panelists' presentations 

    View the video recording here

  • May 27, 2020: Panel on Congressional Oversight Databases

    On May 27, 2020, from 2:00pm-3:30pm, the Levin Center and Wayne Law Review at Wayne State University Law School held an online panel for scholars via the Zoom webinar platform on "Congressional Oversight Databases." The panel highlighted three new and exciting databases that can be used to conduct research related to congressional oversight.

    The panel of experts included:

    • Daniel Carpenter, Allie S. Freed Professor of Government Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, who moderated the panel.
    • Jamie Spitz, The Lugar Center, who discussed the Center’s new oversight database with over 20,000 congressional oversight hearings and individual committee evaluations.
    • Molly Reynolds, The Brookings Institution, who discussed Brookings’ new real-time House Oversight Tracker following House oversight of the executive branch.
    • Professor Jonathan Lewallen, University of Tampa, who discussed the long-standing U.S. Policy Agendas Project at the University of Texas, including its collection of over 100,000 congressional hearings from 1946 to 2017.

    Introductory remarks were also provided by Levin Center Director Jim Townsend and Wayne Law Review Editor William Broman.

     

  • Jan. 24, 2020: Conference on Emerging Case Law

    On January 24, 2020, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., from 9:00am-11:30am, the Levin Center at Wayne Law held a half-day conference on emerging federal case law related to congressional oversight investigations. Four panelists with congressional oversight expertise spoke.

    • Jonathan Adler, Johan Verheij memorial professor of law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
    • Kirsten Matoy Carlson, associate professor, Wayne State University Law School
    • Victoria Nourse, Ralph V. Whitworth professor in law, Georgetown University Law Center
    • Andrew Wright, partner, K&L Gates LLP. 

    Emerging Case Law Website

  • Dec. 6, 2019: Congressional Oversight of Science & Technology

    Symposium Overview

    The Levin Center at Wayne Law hosted a half-day symposium December 6th on how to strengthen Congress' ability to oversee science and technology.  The symposium highlighted two reports: "Building a 21st Century Congress: Improving Congress' Science and Technology Expertise" by the Belfer Center and the recently released "Science and Technology Policy Assessment" by the National Academy of Public Administration.  Following the presentation of the two reports, a panel of experts discussed their reactions to the reports and future options.  A question and answer session followed. 

    Agenda

    9:00 a.m. Opening Remarks:     

    • Congressman Mark Takano
    • Senator Tom Tillis (by video)

    9:30 a.m. Presentation of Reports:

    • Belfer Center:  Laura Manley, Director, Technology and Public Purpose Project
    • National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA):  Roger Kodat, Senior Project Director

    10:15 a.m. Panel Discussion:

    • Moderator: Grace Gedye, The Washington Monthly
    • Alex Givens, Director, Institute for Technology, Law, and Policy, Georgetown Law School, and former Chief Counsel for Senator Leahy on the Antitrust Subcommittee 
    • Peter Blair, Executive Director, National Academy of Sciences/Division of Engineering and Physical Sciences and former Assistant Director, OTA 
    • Tim Persons, Chief Scientist, GAO's Science, Technology Assessment, and Analytics (STAA) office                       
    • Ali Nouri, President, Federation of American Scientists 

    11:00 a.m. Question & Answer Session

    11:25 a.m. Closing Remarks

  • March 22, 2019: Gerrymandering: The Power of Boundaries
    In 1812, cartoonist Elkanah Tisdale altered the political vocabulary of the United States forever when he rendered the voting districts of the state of Massachusetts, then under the leadership of Governor Elbridge Gerry, in the image of the "Gerry-mander," an animal somewhere between a vulture and a salamander.  Gerrymandering has figured heavily in the history of U.S. elections and has recently made headlines again as communities around the nation face questions about the constitutionality of using independent commissions to redraw district lines, the effects of counting prison inmates as constituents in the counties in which the prisons reside, and how partisan gerrymandering disproportionately affects communities of color and voters who have been "packed, stacked, and cracked" in order to provide an advantage for one political party or the other.
     

    Symposium Overview

    On Friday, March 22, 2019, the Levin Center at Wayne Law, together with The Journal of Law in Society, held a symposium entitled "Gerrymandering: The Power of Boundaries" with to foster civil discourse on this matter of rapidly evolving public policy. Leading scholars from around the U.S. joined experts from Wayne State University to discuss partisan gerrymandering and race-based redistricting in a full-day event.  Michigan's newly elected Secretary of State and former Wayne Law Dean Jocelyn Benson provided keynote remarks.

    Schedule

    8:30 a.m. Breakfast in atrium 

    8:45 a.m. Opening remarks

    • Former U.S. Sen. Carl Levinchair, Levin Center at Wayne Law; distinguished legislator in residence, Wayne Law
    • Emad Hamadeh, editor-in-chief, The Journal of Law in Society

    9:00 a.m. Keynote speaker

    9:45 a.m. Gerrymandering: Past, Present, and Future

    • Jowei Chen, associate professor and faculty associate at the Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan
    • James Lancaster, chief counsel, Voters Not Politicians
    • Eric Lupher, president, Citizens Research Council of Michigan
    • Moderator: Justin Long, associate professor, Wayne Law

    11:00 a.m. Refreshment Break

    11:15 a.m. Race-Based Redistricting

    • Guy-Uriel Charles, Edward and Ellen Schwarzman professor of law and director, Duke Law Center on Law, Race, and Politics, Duke University School of Law
    • Aleks Kajstura, attorney and legal director, Prison Policy Initiative
    • G. Michael Parsons, assistant professor, New York University School of Law
    • Moderator: Rhonda Haidar, symposium editor, Journal of Law in Society

    12:30 p.m. Lunch in the atrium

    1:30 p.m. Political Gerrymandering and the U.S. Constitution

    • Edward B. "Ned" Foley, Charles W. Ebersold and Florence Whitcomb Ebersold chair in constitutional law and director of Election Law @ Moritz, Moritz College of Law at Ohio State
    • Nicholas Stephanopoulos, professor and Herbert and Marjorie Fried research scholar, University of Chicago Law School
    • Daniel P. Tokaji, Charles W. Ebersold and Florence Whitcomb Ebersold professor of constitutional law, Moritz College of Law at Ohio State
    • Steven Winter, Walter S. Gibbs distinguished professor of constitutional law, Wayne Law
    • Moderator: Jonathan Weinberg, associate dean for research and faculty development, Wayne Law

    3:00 p.m. Closing Remarks

    • Rhonda Haidar, symposium editor, The Journal of Law in Society

    3:15 p.m. Networking reception

  • June 13, 2018: The Role of Inspectors General in Congressional Oversight
    In honor of the 40th anniversary of the Inspectors General Act, the Levin Center at Wayne State University Law School hosted a two-panel symposium in Washington, D.C. on "The Role of Inspectors General in Congressional Oversight.

    9:00 a.m. Opening remarks

    Former U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, chair of the Levin Center at Wayne Law and Wayne Law's distinguished legislator in residence, and Inspector General Michael Horowitz of the U.S. Department of Justice

    9:20 a.m. Panel 1: 

    • David Buckley, former inspector general, Central Intelligence Agency
    • Kathy Buller, inspector general, Peace Corps; chair of the Legislation Committee for the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
    • DeLisa Lay, senior investigative counsel, majority staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee
    • Jonathan Skladany, chief policy counsel, majority staff of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
    • John Sopko, special inspector general for Afghanistan Reconstruction
    • Moderator: Eleanor Hill, former inspector general, Department of Defense 

    10:30 a.m. Break

    10:45 a.m. Panel 2: 

    • Dan Blair, senior counselor, Bipartisan Policy Center
    • Beryl Davis, director of financial management and assurance, Government Accountability Office
    • Peter Tyler, senior policy analyst, Project on Government Oversight
    • Moderator: Peg Gustafson, inspector general, Department of Commerce 

    11:45 a.m. Closing remarks

  • Mar. 23, 2018: Congressional Oversight in the 21st Century

    On Friday, March 23, 2018, the Levin Center and Wayne Law Review held a symposium on "Congressional Oversight in the 21st Century." Leading scholars from across the country explored the definition of congressional oversight and how best to measure its effectiveness, examined the relationship of oversight and the judicial branch, and discussed various tools and mechanisms involved in conducting fact-based, bipartisan oversight.  The well-attended symposium, with more than 80 law students, scholars, and others in the audience, took place at the Partrich Auditorium at Wayne State University Law School in Detroit.

    This symposium was made possible, in part, by generous funding from the Cohn Family Endowed Fund.

    Symposium overview

    When conducted on a bipartisan basis, with a commitment to finding the facts and uncovering the truth, congressional oversight fulfills the checks and balances envisioned by the Constitution, fosters bipartisan legislative relationships, engenders public trust in legislatures, and improves policy and government programs. 

    In June 2017, the Levin Center at Wayne Law hosted a Scholars Roundtable on Congressional Oversight. This event was the first of its kind in the United States, bringing experts from across the country to Detroit to encourage increased academic research into the legal, political and historical aspects of congressional oversight investigations, techniques and effectiveness, and its role in the constitutional system of checks and balances. The Wayne Law Review Symposium built upon the energy and momentum from that gathering.

    Read the Levin-Bean law review article: "Defining Congressional Oversight and Measuring Its Effectiveness" (pdf)

    Read the entire edition: Congressional Oversight in the 21st Century (Volume 64, No. 1)

    Schedule

    9:00 a.m.: Breakfast in atrium 

    9:30 a.m.: Opening remarks

    • Richard A. Bierschbach, dean and professor, Wayne State University Law School
    • Former U.S. Sen. Carl Levinchair, Levin Center at Wayne Law; distinguished legislator in residence, Wayne Law
    • Dane Lepola, editor-in-chief, Wayne Law Review

    10:00 a.m.: Defining Congressional Oversight and Measuring its Effectiveness

    • Dr. Frank R. Baumgartner, Richard J. Richardson distinguished professor of political science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • Alan Kahn, public interest director, University of Michigan Law School
    • Dr. Kevin Kosar, vice president of policy, R Street Institute
    • Jonathan Lewallen, assistant professor of political science, University of Tampa
    • Moderator: William Marshall, William Rand Kenan Jr. distinguished professor, University of North Carolina School of Law

    11:15 a.m.: Refreshment break

    11:30 a.m.: Congressional Oversight and the Judicial Branch

    • Dr. Lauren C. Bell, dean of academic affairs, professor, Randolph-Macon College
    • J. Richard Broughton, associate dean for academic affairs, associate professor, University of Detroit Mercy School of Law
    • Morgan Frankel, deputy U.S. senate legal counsel, Office of Senate Legal Counsel
    • Moderator: Heidi Kitrosser, professor, University of Minnesota Law School

    12:45 p.m.: Lunch in atrium

    1:15 p.m.: Keynote speaker

    • Steve Castor, chief investigative counsel, U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform under Chairman Trey Gowdy
    • Introduced by: Robert M. Ackerman, professor, Wayne Law; director, Levin Center at Wayne Law

    2:00 p.m.: Congressional Oversight: Tools and Topics

    • Kimberly Breedon, independent legal scholar
    • A. Christopher Bryant, Rufus King professor of constitutional law, University of Cincinnati College of Law
    • Dr. Brian D. Feinstein, Harry A. Bigelow Teaching Fellow, lecturer in law, University of Chicago Law School
    • Andrew Wright, associate professor, Savannah Law School
    • Moderator: Kathleen Clark, professor, Washington University School of Law

    3:30 p.m.: Closing remarks

    • Thomas Lurie, symposium editor, Wayne Law Review
    • Elise Bean, Washington co-director, Levin Center at Wayne Law

    4:00 p.m.: Cocktails and networking reception

  • Nov. 10, 2017: Current Issues in Immigration Law

    More than 90 people attended the Levin Center at Wayne Law's Nov. 10 symposium in Detroit, "Current Issues in Immigration Law: Detention, 'Sanctuary Cities,' and the 'Travel Ban.'"

    The event brought together top scholars and leaders from across the country to discuss the following topics:

    • Immigration Detention in the United States
    • Sanctuary Cities: Immigration Law Meets Federalism
    • Iraqi Deportations in Detroit: Community Perspectives and Responses
    • The President, the Courts and the "Travel Ban"

    Eighteen experts participated in the event, hailing from institutions including Georgetown University Law Center, University of Michigan Law School and University of Denver Sturm College of Law. Moderating the discussions (respectively) were Associate Professor Rachel Settlage, Professor Paul Dubinsky, Assistant Professor (Clinical) Sabrina Balgamwalla, and Professor Jonathan T. Weinberg, all members of the Wayne Law faculty.

    Providing opening remarks were conference moderator Professor Robert M. Ackerman, director of the Levin Center at Wayne Law; Dean Richard A. Bierschbach; and former U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, chair of the Levin Center at Wayne Law.

    More information on the Levin Center at Wayne Law and Wayne State University Law School

    This conference was made possible through the generous support of the Manoogian Simone Foundation and the Alex and Marie Manoogian Foundation.

  • Jan. 31, 2017: Next Steps in Offshore Multinational Corporate Tax

    More than 100 people attended the Levin Center at Wayne Law's half-day conference, "Next Steps in Offshore Multinational Corporate Tax," on Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2017, in Washington, D.C. Co-chaired by retired U.S. Senators Carl Levin and Tom A. Coburn, M.D., the conference provided a bipartisan setting for examining a variety of corporate tax issues being considered by the new Congress in connection with comprehensive corporate tax reform. The conference included a brief presentation of key issues by the panel moderator, drawing on past congressional tax oversight investigations, followed by an extended dialogue on the issues by the five panelists. Check back for video from the conference. 

    Conference overview

    At the time of the conference, corporate tax reform was a dominant topic of interest on the Washington agenda, but its pace and contours were still unknown. Panelists presented diverse views on how Congress and the new administration could tackle issues related to multinational corporate offshore profits. One major topic that provided a backdrop to the discussion was the practice of some U.S. multinationals of declaring an increasing share of their profits in offshore tax havens. Bipartisan congressional oversight investigations have disclosed how those profitable U.S. multinationals have shifted billions of dollars to low-tax jurisdictions, deferred or avoided paying U.S. taxes on those profits, and helped reduce the corporate share of U.S. taxes to a near all-time low.  

    In addition to discussing the role of tax havens in U.S. corporate tax avoidance, the panelists addressed a number of other corporate tax issues including:

    • Future tax treatment of corporate foreign earnings;
    • The pros and cons of a tax holiday on offshore corporate profits;
    • The consequences of adopting proposed border adjustment tax reform;
    • Use of corporate tax revenues to fund infrastructure; and
    • Possible responses to European illegal state aid cases. 

    Speakers

    Conference co-chairs

    Retired U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, D-MI, is chair of the Levin Center at Wayne Law, Wayne Law's distinguished legislator in residence, and former chair of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations which, during his tenure, conducted bipartisan inquiries into a wide range of corporate tax matters.

    Read his prepared remarks here

    Retired U.S. Sen. Tom A. Coburn, M.D., R-OK, served in the U.S. Senate from 2005 to 2014 and in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2001.  As former ranking Republican on the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, he participated in corporate tax investigations and also introduced corporate tax legislation.

    Other speakers

    Robert B. Stack is deputy assistant secretary (international tax affairs) for the U.S. Department of the Treasury. In addition to overseeing development of U.S. international tax policy, he serves as the U.S. delegate to the Committee on Fiscal Affairs in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and to the Global Forum on Transparency. His last day in office is Jan. 20, 2017. 

    Edward Kleinbard is the Johnson professor of law and business at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, and a fellow at The Century Foundation. Previously, he was chief of staff for Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation.

    Paul W. Oosterhuis is of counsel at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in Washington, D.C. Oosterhuis is an international tax attorney representing clients on a wide range of international and U.S. tax matters. He has extensive experience in international mergers and acquisitions, post-acquisition integration transactions, spin-offs, internal restructurings and joint venture transactions. He also represents multinational companies in non-transactional international tax planning and IRS controversy matters.

    Moderating the discussion will be Elise Bean, Washington co-director for the Levin Center at Wayne Law. From 2003 to 2014, she served as staff director and chief counsel for Sen. Levin on the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. For the second consecutive year, Bean was named to the Global Tax 50, an international list of 50 people and organizations who influenced tax policy.

    View her presentation here

    Background material

    General

    Reports on offshore corporate tax matters by the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations: 

    Donald J. Trump's infrastructure plan

    Proposed border adjustment tax provisions

    European actions to combat multinational corporate tax avoidance

  • Oct. 25, 2016: A Right to "Know" or a Right to "No"?

    Examining the Congressional-Executive Branch Struggle Over Access to Information

    More than 90 people attended a half-day conference co-sponsored by the Levin Center at Wayne Law and The Constitution Project on Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2016, in Washington, D.C. The conference was live-streamed on C-SPAN and looked at the tension between Congress' constitutional responsibility to oversee the workings of the executive branch and the president's claims of executive privilege and deliberative process in order to protect the inner workings of the White House. The conference consisted of two panels of experienced practitioners and distinguished scholars.

    Conference overview

    The Constitution gives Congress the responsibility to serve as a check on the operations of the vast expanse of the executive branch. That responsibility has long been recognized as an integral part of our system of checks and balances. 

    In 1927 the Supreme Court explicitly stated in the case of McGrain v. Daugherty: "We are of the opinion that the power of inquiry – with process to enforce it – is an essential and appropriate auxiliary to the legislative function."

    That was reinforced in the 1957 case of Watkins v. the U.S. when the Supreme Court clearly acknowledged Congress' inherent power to conduct investigations, stating it was a broad power, including "inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws", needed statutes, defects in our social, economic, or political system, and "probes…to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste."

    In order for oversight to work, Congress has to know what's going on in the executive branch. That means making demands on the executive branch for information – both documents and witnesses – and that often creates a tension between the two branches. The degree of that tension between the Congress and the administration over access to executive branch information varies from Congress to Congress based on a number of elements. These include the popularity of the president, congressional leadership, the issues being investigated, the degree of public interest, the presence or absence of criminal culpability, the individual personalities involved and the state of the law. Given the election of a new president and new Congress, this was a this was a meaningful time to review the rights, rules and principles that govern this inter-branch tug of war, and to contemplate the path forward. Questions addressed included whether reform is necessary to ensure that Congress can access the information it needs to check the executive branch effectively and how Congress should best be held accountable for using its oversight powers and tools appropriately.

    Speakers

    Welcome and overview

    • Former U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, chair, Levin Center at Wayne Law
    • Virginia Sloan, president, The Constitution Project

    Panel one: Recent Developments in the Law on Congressional Access to Information

    • Steve Castor, deputy general counsel, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
    • David Hayes, distinguished visiting lecturer in law, Stanford Law School
    • Ronald Weich, dean, University of Baltimore School of Law
    • Andrew Wright, associate professor, Savannah Law School
    • Moderator: Linda Gustitus, Washington co-director, Levin Center at Wayne Law; former staff director, U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations

    Panel two: Is the Current System Working or Does it Need Reform?

    • Josh Chafetz, professor of law, Cornell Law School
    • Kerry Kircher, former general counsel, U.S. House of Representatives
    • Mort Rosenberg, former specialist in American public law, Congressional Research Service
    • Moderator: Jocelyn Benson, director, Levin Center at Wayne Law
  • Oct. 20, 2015: Congressional Oversight of Classified Programs

    The Levin Center at Wayne Law presented a half-day conference, "Congressional Oversight of Classified Programs – 40 Years after the Church Committee," on Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2015, in Washington, D.C. The conference, the first for the newly established Levin Center, reviewed the status of the Church Committee reforms of 1975 and Congress' ability to oversee classified programs. The conference consisted of three panel discussions in the Kennedy Caucus Room of the Russell Senate Office Building. Nine panelists and two moderators participated, and about 100 people attended the conference, which also was live streamed online. 

    Conference overview

    This is a timely subject in light of the recent disputes between Congress and the Executive Branch over the CIA interrogation program and the National Security Agency's expansive eavesdropping on the American public.

    The overall theme of the conference was the mechanics, difficulties and importance of congressional oversight of intelligence activities, in particular how to oversee covert operations, secret budgets and classified materials. Congress is charged under the Constitution with the responsibility to inform the public of the workings of its government and the issues that the government should address. To meet that responsibility Congress needs to have the facts about what actions the Executive Branch is taking and upon what basis in law the Executive Branch is acting. Getting those facts becomes particularly difficult when the programs Congress is overseeing are subject to classification. Yet the programs carried out by agencies such as the CIA can have long-lasting ramifications to the future health and well being of the country and its people.

    This conference looked at one of the most successful reviews of secret or covert activities by the CIA, the Church Committee investigation, and gleaned the lessons learned from the conduct of that committee. The conference addressed the complex interaction of the oversight responsibilities of Congress with the classification of national security secrets by the Executive Branch and identify ways in which the two interests can be satisfied.

    The U.S. Senate's Church Committee, convened in 1975 and led by Sen. Frank Church of Idaho, was tasked with investigating federal intelligence operations in the wake of the Watergate scandal and the revelation of spying by the CIA on anti-war activists. 

    Conference agenda

    8:30 a.m. – Opening and introductions by moderators

    • Former U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chair of the Levin Center at Wayne Law and former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee
    • Former U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., president of The Lugar Center and former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

    9 to 10:30 a.m. – Panel One: The Church Committee's Experience with Classified Information 

    • Moderator – Michael German, fellow, Brennan Center for Justice, Liberty and National Security Program.
    • Frederick A.O. "Fritz" Schwarz Jr., chief counsel of the Brennan Center. From 1975 to 1976, Schwarz was chief counsel to the Church Committee. He recently has written the book Democracy in the Dark: The Seduction of Government Secrecy.
    • Dr. Loch K. Johnson, regents professor of political science in the Department of International Affairs at the University of Georgia. Johnson was special assistant to the chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Oversight from 1975 to 1976. He also served as staff director of the House Subcommittee on Intelligence Oversight from 1977 to 1979. In 1995 and 1996, Johnson worked with the chair of the Aspin-Brown Commission on Intelligence. He is the author of the book A Season of Inquiry, which provides an inside look at the operations of the Church Committee.
    • Morton Halperin, senior advisor to the Open Society Foundation. Halperin had a distinguished career in federal government, having served in the Clinton, Nixon and Johnson administrations. From 1975 to 1992, he served as the director of the Center for National Security Studies, where he was involved in the work of the Church Committee and contributed to the drafting of Senate Resolution 400. 

    10:30 to 10:45 a.m. – Break

    10:45 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. – Panel Two: Post Church Oversight and Congress' Responsibility to Know and to Inform the Public

    • Moderator – Laura K. Donohue, professor at Georgetown University Law School, director of Georgetown's Center on National Security and the Law, and director of the Center on Privacy and Technology. She is working on The Future of Foreign Intelligence (Oxford University Press, 2015), focusing on the Fourth Amendment and surveillance in a digital world. A previous book, The Cost of Counterterrorism: Power, Politics, and Liberty (Cambridge University Press, 2008) looked at the impact of American and British counterterrorist law on life, liberty, property, privacy and free speech. Her articles have examined topics including the doctrine of state secrets and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and she has held numerous fellowships related to international security.
    • Eleanor J. Hill, a partner in the law firm of King Spalding. She has more than 33 years of experience handling investigations in both the public and private sector. She served as the staff director in 2002 for the bipartisan, bicameral Joint Congressional Inquiry on the September 11th Attacks. From 1995 through 1999, Hill served as inspector general to the Department of Defense. Prior to that, she served as chief counsel and staff director to the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
    • Michael J. Glennon, professor of international law at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Prior to teaching, he was legal counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (1977 to 1980). He was a Fulbright Distinguished Professor of International and Constitutional Law and Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and has served as a consultant to various congressional committees, the State Department and the International Atomic Energy Agency. His latest book, National Security and Double Government, challenges the view that U.S. security policy is forged by America's visible "Madisonian institutions," the president, Congress and the courts.
    • Daniel Jones, professional staff member, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. During his nearly nine-year tenure with the committee, Jones has been responsible for the counterterrorism and counterintelligence oversight accounts and has led several of the committee's most high-profile investigations, including the committee's most-recent 6,700-page Study of the CIA's Detention and Interrogation program (aka the "Senate Torture Report"). Prior to joining the committee, Jones worked at the FBI, where he supported senior officials in their management of international operations and investigations.
    • Benjamin A. Powell, a partner in the law firm of WilmerHale and co-chair of its cybersecurity, privacy and communications practice. In 2005, he was nominated by President George W. Bush and unanimously confirmed by the Senate to serve as the first general counsel of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. He served as general counsel for the first three directors. Prior to that, he had served as special assistant to President Bush and as associate White House counsel.

    12:30 to 1:30 p.m. – Lunch Panel: Achieving Fact-Based, Bipartisan Oversight of the Intelligence Community

    • Sen. Levin and Sen. Lugar will discuss past experiences with oversight of the intelligence community, the oversight problems involving classified materials and what needs to be done to ensure good oversight.

    Suggested reading list for conference